I'm definitely not a feminist. You won't find me naked in public, raging and hurling myself at Vladimir Putin. You won't find me hating men, or behaving like a moron and trying to divide the sexes even further.
You will however find me speaking out if someone is being treated badly, be they male or female. In my experience, women get treated differently to men. When a female politician fucks up, it's somehow really important to the media to note her biological sex and gender. Hmm, when Bush, Blair, Obama, Brown, Clinton, Reagan, Nixon, Trudeau, Harper, Sarkozy, Hollande, Berlusconi and that idiot Trump etc. screwed up in multiple ways, nobody was going on about their biological sex/gender. Nobody said: Male politicians Bush and Blair wreak war and havoc on Iraq; Male politician Trump wants to curb abortion etc.
So why is it that when female/women do anything that's frowned upon, their biological sex/gender is immediately noted?
David Icke doesn't appear to have much sympathy for women, which isn't surprising. His main fan base consists of angry, aggressive white males, so his casual perpetuation of misogyny isn't surprising. The Independent Newspaper reported on the actions and thoughts of a US politician. Their headline: Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'. David Icke simply stuck the same headline on his headline-page. Or maybe it was Andrew Cheetham, whoever that is. No thought, no critical thinking, just copy and paste. However, seeing this kind of headline instantly got my back up....and then I saw that the Independent had 'started it'. David Icke/Andrew Cheetham continued it.
It doesn't take a lot of brain power to understand that someone's gender/biological sex is not linked to their mental stability or work...but the alt-right revels in hating women. They profile women the same way they profile races that are not white, muslims, gays, foreigners, immigrants, gypsies, refugees etc. Have a look at any article about women who have committed some kind of error, mistake, crime, faux pas, or come up with any kind of idea that involves men, and there's instant rage against WOMEN, not a woman, or the particular woman in question. Why? Women are constantly having moronic men in power tell them what to do, you don't find sane women raging about 'men'. Sane women rage about the policies and the individual person.
It turns out that she is trying to highlight the difficulties and strife women face from the state when it comes to their healthcare, and in particular their rights regarding abortion. It turns out that she has no hope of the bill ever passing, but is doing it as a means to illustrate how unbalanced and unfair the 'law' is when it comes to women. Oh well, nevermind, let's just hate women, so much easier.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world … 26441.html
Most of the rabid DI and Trump fanatics would not even be able to read the article, seeing as the headline is enough to get their blood boiling....
....Ms Farrar told mysanantonio.com: "A lot of people find the bill funny. What's not funny are the obstacles that Texas women face every day, that were placed there by legislatures making it very difficult for them to access healthcare."
RT.com reports:
Farrar does not expect, or even hope, the bill will pass. However, she hopes it will force her Republican colleagues to reexamine some of their laws on women’s healthcare in the Lone Star State, which is home to the highest maternal mortality rate in the country.
RT.com, like many other media/news sources, has become the home of the alt-right fascist nutcase movement....have a look at the comments from the nazi saints who never make mistakes, always know what's right from wrong, and loathe women. Disgusting or what....
